How does potassium argon dating work nick broomfield dating

08-Feb-2016 17:10

This was an important publication because this dated volcanic rock was going to be used as an 'event horizon', which means all other dates for all other findings in this area would then be cross-referenced to the KBS tuff.In 1972, evolutionist Richard Leakey was digging in the KBS tuff and found a human skull (#KNM-ER 1470).

how does potassium argon dating work-4how does potassium argon dating work-21how does potassium argon dating work-53how does potassium argon dating work-7

I can't exactly follow the logic, but I'm asking here about the dating process itself. I do not think that Argon-40 decays into Argon-39 as the article states, at least not all by itself. Based on the atmospheric 40-Ar/36-Ar ratio and the 36-concentration, the 40-Ar concentration at the time of formation is calculated.

The average person reading this might not think anything significant about this find, but for the evolutionist, it is DEVISTATING!

Remember earlier how I pointed out that they don't really date things by radiometric dating, and how they actually use the geologic column?

In "The Carbon Dating Game," we covered flaws, assumptions, and cherry-picking in dating methods that are said to be used for up to 50,000 years, which many evolutionists still use to say the dates of the Bible incorrect.

In this article, we will be going over potassium-argon dating (K-Ar) to explain the flaws, assumptions, and cherry-picking in dating methods that are said to be used in dating billions of years, and according to most evolutionists, "proof" of an old-earth.

I can't exactly follow the logic, but I'm asking here about the dating process itself. I do not think that Argon-40 decays into Argon-39 as the article states, at least not all by itself. Based on the atmospheric 40-Ar/36-Ar ratio and the 36-concentration, the 40-Ar concentration at the time of formation is calculated.

The average person reading this might not think anything significant about this find, but for the evolutionist, it is DEVISTATING!

Remember earlier how I pointed out that they don't really date things by radiometric dating, and how they actually use the geologic column?

In "The Carbon Dating Game," we covered flaws, assumptions, and cherry-picking in dating methods that are said to be used for up to 50,000 years, which many evolutionists still use to say the dates of the Bible incorrect.

In this article, we will be going over potassium-argon dating (K-Ar) to explain the flaws, assumptions, and cherry-picking in dating methods that are said to be used in dating billions of years, and according to most evolutionists, "proof" of an old-earth.

This is exactly how it's done, and all of it comes down to the circular reasoning dating methods used for fossils dating rocks and rocks dating fossils. 226), along with many other major science journals, published the dates of volcanic rock from the KBS tuff (tuff = volcanic rock and ash; named after Kay Behrensmeyer) in Kenya.